埃里希·萨洛蒙博士假装手臂骨折以将相机藏在石膏中——第一张最高法院内部照片

I bet it helps that it was created in 2009.

Well, even historically, Europe has made a lot of negative experiences with pillory. The main motivation is not making a spectacle out of it (See Depp vs Heard) or multigenerational drama (Most of human civilization), but it also serves the protection of everyone involved, even if that just protects their privacy. I do think that there are reasonable exceptions for those rules, but even then, it should happen in a very clear legal framework, which doesn't allow media exploitation.

Why even bother with sketches if they are done from memory? Everyone working in law enforcement should know how unreliable and easily altered memory is.

I believe France bans photos of the faces of those charged with crimes from being published in the media until they’re convicted.

I just love how people reply with "WRONG." sometimes. Like god forbid you correct someone respectfully, instead you have to DUNK on them.

While I agree with you, there have been a few egregious, shameful errors. Dred Scott, for one. But the most politically motivated, history changing SCOTUS decision was Bush v. Gore in 2000. Every time I hear MAGA outrage over 2020 “voter fraud” — backed up by zero evidence — I counter with the 2000 Election, where the brother of a candidate, the Governor of the deciding State, gets the Secy of State to stop counting the vote when — surprise — the Governor’s brother was conveniently ahead by **537 votes** When the FL Supreme Court ordered that the recount continue, SCOTUS —- by 5-4 (Conservative majority) — reversed that decision. The swing vote came from Justice O’Connor who later voiced regret for her decision. So, the 2000 Presidency, the popular vote of which Gore won by 600,000 votes, Gore lost by 537 Votes in the deciding state which then gave Bush a **one vote** Electoral College victory gave Bush the victory. And while we have no assurance that Gore would have been wonderful, we DO KNOW that Bush gave us 9/11, an endless war in the the Middle East, the 2008 Financial Crisis, extraordinary debt, etc., non of which was guaranteed under Gore. But Bush’s packing of SCOTUS was the biggest impact. Alito and Roberts, then decisions such as Citizens United, leading to the Trump debacle of three appointments, bringing a generation or more of Conservative leadership on the Court. And, to put an exclamation point on all of this, During the actual counting process in Florida during this election, once Bush was ahead by the handful of votes, Republican activists staged what became known as the Brooks brothers riot to pressure state officials to stop counting the votes. Along with Roger Stone, this pressure campaign was assisted by – – wait for it – – Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Comey Barrett, Who was rewarded for their efforts 20 years later by being appointed to the Supreme Court. https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/17/politics/bush-v-gore-barrett-kavanaugh-roberts-supreme-court/index.html So, whenever I hear the bull$hit about the 2020 election being “stolen,“ I point out that there was indeed an election stolen in the 21st-century, and it has helped bring us to where we are today.

The supreme court is filled with political actors just like the other branches, and limiting public access into their decision making processes is an unqualified bad thing.

I took a supreme court class in college. We went through every year of the court since its inception. On the whole, The decisions have held back progress and the people at nearly every turn. Obviously, there have been exceptions and court makeupups where that’s not the case. But for the most part, the decisions are made by very old white men who are way behind the times in the United States.

Thats lots of nostalgia, imagination and out right lies from analog fans, through. You will not get 4k real resolution out of most movies shot before the 90s (and no, the pixel size on the video files do not count, you can scan any crap with 16k resolution). Film lenses were NOT sharp due to film being very dim and needing very wide apertures in addition to the fact that glass tech was much worse. Add to his generational losses and focus issues due to film motion during taking a shot, and you typcal film movie ariving in the cinemas had between 720p and 960p of real fourier limited resolution back then. 1080p digital projection was an _improvement_ in 90%+ of cases. The only thing that really was as good at people claim was large formad b/w still photography, but thats a whole different ballpark in terms of effort and just not compareable to anything we call "camera" nowadays.

Lmaooooooooooo!

Omg he's actually there

The truth is out there.

wtf looks smaller then modern cameras