美国士兵戴着神圣罗马帝国的皇冠。希特勒曾亲自下令寻找这顶皇冠

Swift is the pillow that mows the land

The queen talking about this. https://youtu.be/2CZR0-sigHo

I want a crown for casual occasions too

Yes, other photos of Charlemagne clearly show his head is normal size. /s

A LCpl would place the crown atop his other head.

The SPC actually has to be at work to have a chance at launching the nuke

Wait, so maybe 99% of Crimea doesn’t actually want to be part of Russia?

The election was rigged, yes, but Austria had wanted unification at that time. Under a fair election, it is very likely that the same would have resulted

You have to understand that one major reason for nazi Germany's or hitler's success was the amount of collaborators in many European countries.

You don't have to believe it, but they [welcomed the Nazis. ](/1280px-Anschluss_Heldenplatz1.jpg)

The flip side is you would think the Nazis weren't popular in Austria after the war because you couldn't find a single nazi on either side of the border then

Not that I disagree with you -- I was actually looking up sources to refute the other guy since I suspected he was a Nazi apologist -- [but it seems he's correct.](https://www.facinghistory.org/holocaust-and-human-behavior/chapter-7/taking-austria) > First, there can be no doubt that the initial enthusiasm was both genuine and spontaneous . . . Second, it is clear that the populace was profoundly relieved that bloodshed had been avoided . . . The sight of well-equipped Landsers [German soldiers] marching through the country revived memories of wartime solidarity and evoked a sense of satisfaction that the humiliations of 1918 had at last been overcome. Third, nearly all hoped for a dramatic improvement in the material conditions of everyday life; most Austrians were aware of Hitler's economic achievements and had good reason to believe that their expectations would soon be fulfilled. Fourth, there can be little doubt that millions of people welcomed the Anschluss as a chance to put an end to the so-called Jewish Question. The antisemitic violence that followed . . . was perpetrated by the Austrian Nazis and their accomplices, not by the German invaders. That the new regime openly sanctioned persecution and Aryanization, in other words, could only enhance its popularity. Like, there's a lot to it. The "yes" box was bigger to "remind people of how to vote." Voting wasn't anonymous and was supervised by German military. Certain groups of people (people suspected of being Jewish, Communist, or Roma) were banned from the polling sites. But there's also reasons why people would vote yes, as that quote mentions. Post-Versailles Austria wasn't that great of a place to be. [When the Nazis brought their military into Austria without resistance, they conducted a large propaganda campaign](https://web.archive.org/web/20070404180146/http://www.doew.at/thema/thema_alt/wuv/maerz38_2/propaganda.html) (link in German). There's a chance that the first (cancelled) referendum wouldn't have had as dramatic of a result... but it probably would've still been the same result.

Before that it was kept in Nuremberg regardless of where the emperor lived or who he was. It was mostly austrians before that anyway. The austrians taking it in 1796 actually caused alot of debate. and many people interpreted it as "stealing"

1423, the Emperor of the Holy Roman Empire gives Nuremberg the privilege of keeping the Imperial Crown Jewels safe. IN PERPETUITY. They should have never been moved in the first place.