1945年二战结束时拆箱《蒙娜丽莎》
1945年第二次世界大战结束时，工作人员正在拆开《蒙娜丽莎》的包装。
评论 (106)
kylenigga3,203 赞2017/11/8
Look at this dude touching it
Psychast1,334 赞2017/11/8
Yeah its crazy to see, like a blasphemy but he's so blasé about it that it really seems like no big deal. Trying to even put a finger on that same painting today and you'd never, ever hear the end of that. Despite I'm sure every piece being heavily insured, you'd likely receive death threats globally if you did any harm to it.
[已删除]582 赞2017/11/8
[内容已删除]
TommiHPunkt327 赞2017/11/8
You literally can't touch it, it's behind thick glass
JorjEade147 赞2017/11/8
I wonder when the last time was that someone came into direct contact with it (no gloves etc)
teargasjohnny175 赞2017/11/8
1994 by Bill 'Lefty' Snyder.
boxofstuff165 赞2017/11/8
2003 by Robert Langdon
fly-you-fools117 赞2017/11/8
2009 Sir Digby Chicken Caesar
[已删除]17 赞2017/11/8
Wow a Mitchell and Webb reference this early in the day.
oxygenfrank21 赞2017/11/8
2017 Oxygen Frank
daAceofSpades0934 赞2017/11/8
2017 Kevin Spacey
firstdibbz44 赞2017/11/8
Its okay though. He's gay.
[已删除]20 赞2017/11/8
[内容已删除]
John_Dee_00750 赞2017/11/8
>You literally can't touch it, it's behind thick glass Everyone on Earth knows this. There are undiscovered tribes in the Amazon and unborn babies that know this.
Dappershire33 赞2017/11/8
No. Because it's not. The *Real* Mona Lisa is still with Leo, in his spaceship. He came back to get it when he picked up Elvis. But seriously. I can't believe the real one is where everyone thinks it is.
superspiffy24 赞2017/11/8
I like how everyone is taking you seriously.
Jyben722 赞2017/11/8
I'm pretty sure they wouldn't. It's France, not America. The cops there don't just kill people when they feel like it.
Ntghgthdgdcrtdtrk760 赞2017/11/8
I once visited a Museum with my GF and she touched one of the first painting we saw. The guards were just "wtf are you doing lol" and followed us from afar until we finished visiting. It was not the Mona Lisa though, because it's protected by armored glass and a few feet of densely packed Asian tourists.
covfefeobamanation474 赞2017/11/8
There is no way to get past that impenetrable force, Asian tourists are ruthless.
[已删除]38 赞2017/11/8
[内容已删除]
LecturerThrow93 赞2017/11/8
“Grandma, why were you in your winter coat in the summer?”
“SHUT THE FUCK UP AND EAT YOUR CABBAGE SOUP”
ThankfulStipulate23 赞2017/11/8
Backdrops, at least in the 1800s, were hand-painted, and most were in fact black and white, but there are many examples of backdrops hand-painted with vivid color. It depends on the method used and how the photographer wants the background to come out. Some forms of photography, in the 1800s anyway, would be very insensitive to blue and red, so if any of those colors were used it would look very washed out in the black and white negative. Hence, it was safer to draw the backdrop, and fill it in with pastel greys and blacks, because that way, the resulting image wasn't affected by the way that particular emulsion or that particular mix of chemicals would react to the colors present.
As color photography became more common-place (1910s and onwards) and the equipment as well as the techniques improved, they didn't need to worry about stuff like that anymore, so I can easily imagine this being a backdrop in color.
ObnoxiousLittleCunt85 赞2017/11/8
>I once visited a Museum with my GF and she touched one of the first painting we saw. What's wrong with her?
[已删除]15 赞2017/11/8
Your girlfriends sounds like Patrick from the one episode where he just touches thing and says "touch".
ScheisseMacgyver24 赞2017/11/8
It's almost like France doesn't have millions of armed citizens.
[已删除]48 赞2017/11/8
[内容已删除]
[已删除]20 赞2017/11/8
Yes and the culture comes from everyone having guns. When you can see clear data that theres a strong connection between number of guns in a country and number of deaths by guns in a country there shouldnt be denial about that.
[已删除]15 赞2017/11/8
[内容已删除]
Chubs122425 赞2017/11/8
Its weird I have seen pictures of people holding yhe Dead Sea Scrolls in their bare hands while smoking in a sunlit room. That makes me cringe so hard.
UTclimber43 赞2017/11/8
It's actually safer to hold paper documents in a clean bare hand vs. gloved hand. With bare hands the holder has better tactile recognition and can hold and handle the document properly, where as gloved hands have caused damage items from the holder over gripping the item. We use gloves on photographs and paintings. Source: I'm a (was) archivist. Edit: I somehow missed the bit about smoking. Smoking is bad.
lurker4lyfe696917 赞2017/11/8
[Well look what happen to paintings when you touch them with bare hands](
) - Jesus Christ!!! - you can say that again
) - Jesus Christ!!! - you can say that againMidokiioo105 赞2017/11/8
[内容已删除]
_demetri_122 赞2017/11/8
Kind of looks like he’s erect from her beauty.
[已删除]55 赞2017/11/8
Found Yoshikage Kira
Chieron27 赞2017/11/8
IsThatAMotherFuckinJoJoReference.png
KanchiHaruhara32 赞2017/11/8
*How do I say this*
gotdamngotaboldck17 赞2017/11/8
Yo-shi-kah-gey Keeda I think.
1,726 赞2017/11/8
I don't think people realize that you had to basically recolor the fucking Mona Lisa in this. This is damn impressive.
704 赞2017/11/8
I think that would be the easiest part since there are color photographs of the Mona Lisa. You could just take the color picture and overlay it over the B&W version.
203 赞2017/11/8
yeah but that's the only part that will look wrong if you don't do it right
184 赞2017/11/8
Not really. This is a surprisingly common belief, but it's not rooted in truth. The human visual system is extremely tolerant to strangeness in color. Color is far less important to us than intensity information. We use intensity to determine shape, but color is used for surprisingly little. It's important, of course, but much less so than intensity. Of course, you can always argue that if it looks bad, they did it wrong. But my point here is that "doing it right" is a surprisingly easy bar to clear. OP probably spent a lot of time on this, and it looks pretty amazing. I don't mean to discount their hard work. I'm just saying that it's interesting how easy it is to fool your perceptions. (Yes, your perceptions. Yours in particular are shitty. Everyone else's are fine.)
98 赞2017/11/8
[exactly that](
)
)117 赞2017/11/8
[another neat example](
)
)71 赞2017/11/8
Oh hell naw
20 赞2017/11/8
Damn, the brain is fucking amazing.
24 赞2017/11/8
What'll really blow your mind is that your brain has no idea how amazing itself is.
26 赞2017/11/8
I'd argue that [this](
) version is even more convincingly red. Colour constancy is interesting.
) version is even more convincingly red. Colour constancy is interesting.411 赞2017/11/8
Can anyone tell me the history behind this?
743 赞2017/11/8
Like most important artefacts in museums across Europe. It must have been put in safe keeping to protect it from bombs and fighting.
This is it coming back out after the war.
262 赞2017/11/8
Not to mention general looting by those looking to add to their personal collections (or to sell to those looking to do the same)
165 赞2017/11/8
[内容已删除]
217 赞2017/11/8
There are a lot of differing factors that all contributed to the painting becoming widely recognized and popular but what really threw it into international stardom was its theft in 1911.
98 赞2017/11/8
TIL it was stolen once. Thanks!
138 赞2017/11/8
Twice if you count France stealing it
55 赞2017/11/8
That was what the thief thought, but even though lots of paintings have indeed been stolen over the centuries, the Mona Lisa isn't one. King Francis I^st got it after the death of his friend Da Vinci.
25 赞2017/11/8
o shit
29 赞2017/11/8
[内容已删除]
82 赞2017/11/8
[内容已删除]
117 赞2017/11/8
The kardashian of art edit: thanks
28 赞2017/11/8
That's a great way of putting it, it's famous for being famous.
28 赞2017/11/8
Not to mention the fact it was painted by Da Vinci...one of the most talented and probably intelligent people to ever live. I feel like everyone here is missing that major detail haha.
72 赞2017/11/8
Adding in that Leonardo Da Vinci art works are very rare. There are only 15 (including paintings) that exist in the whole world, and even that number is in dispute. So even without the "infamy", the Mona Lisa would be very very valuable by virtue of the limited output of its creator. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_works_by_Leonardo_da_Vinci
26 赞2017/11/8
TIL Da Vinci is the artist behind the Last Supper. Possibly the second most famous paining of all time after the Mona Lisa. That’s insane
42 赞2017/11/8
[And it came even closer to being obliterated during wartime](http://mentalfloss.com/article/64010/how-da-vincis-last-supper-survived-bomb-during-world-war-ii) >During the Napoleonic Wars, Napoleon’s soldiers bunked in Santa Maria della Grazie. When they got bored, they used The Last Supper for target practice, with Jesus’s face as the bullseye. They hit the mark at least a couple of times, but the mural has since been restored.
29 赞2017/11/8
1. It was highly regarded from Leonardo Da Vinci himself, who likely made two or more versions of this portrait and brought the 'Louvre version' with him when he moved to France. Even the young painters from his workshop studied the painting and produced an amount of copies of the *Gioconda*. 2. The true identity of the dame, which is debated to these days. If she was just the wife of a respected person, why in the world was Leonardo so obsessed with his portrait of her? 3. The smile, the veil, the hands, and the landscape. 4. The dark colours attributed to the *patina* of dirt must have looked very appealing to the viewers from the Romantic era. 5. While the theft was also due to the fame of the painting, it certainly contributed to add more to it.
16 赞2017/11/8
> general looting I heard he was prosecuted rather fast after the war.
127 赞2017/11/8
During WW2 the Nazis infamously stole an absurd amount of artwork from every country that they invaded. Many of these paintings went into personal collections of Hitler himself or high-ranking officials, and other paintings, particularly anything abstract, were labeled as degenerate art and destroyed. In preparation for the advancing German forces, the Louvre in Paris scrambled to remove most of their collections from the museum and shipped them vineyards, farms, and properties spread across the south of France in order to make it more difficult to find the artworks. There is a really great documentary about the entirety of the Nazis' conquest of European art called "The Rape of Europa," and it includes a section all about this unfolding in France. Two curators for the Louvre were assigned to look after the Mona Lisa in a castle. Their daughter recounts them opening the painting once they were there. Edit: Somebody has actually uploaded it to [YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAmtXmWFRtA)
24 赞2017/11/8
Museums and churches in London, Paris, Berlin, Rome, and other places across Europe boxed up their collections and moved them to bunkers, vaults and the like in order to protect them from bomb damage, fighting and of course soldiers and the like who may wish to enhance their personal collections or make a quick buck. My local cathedral back when I lived in Germany removed its stained glass windows when war was declared.
22 赞2017/11/8
[Here's a little factoid about why the painting is so famous.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQr4FhbcPMg)
22 赞2017/11/8
I couldn't tolerate to watch more than 5 seconds of that lady in the video
385 赞2017/11/8
[内容已删除]
216 赞2017/11/8
Fun fact, [Here’s how the Mona Lisa would look without all the layers of varnish currently on her.](http://www.lumiere-technology.com/Pages/News/news3.htm)
119 赞2017/11/8
[内容已删除]
40 赞2017/11/8
Nice! You can also check out Prado’s version of the Mona Lisa, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mona_Lisa_(Prado%27s_version) Apparently, it’s the earliest if not the first replica of the Mona Lisa. Much cleaner and better if you ask me.
15 赞2017/11/8
Wow, why is there varnish on it? Was it thought to protect the painting? Did it in fact protect it even though it also dulled the colors?
23 赞2017/11/8
I guess you missed the post a few days ago... https://www.reddit.com/r/gifs/comments/7b74ex/200_years_of_varnish_removed_from_a_painting/
41 赞2017/11/8
Hahaa!... I get it.
177 赞2017/11/8
Is the guy’s hair on the right like a normal haircut back then? People today pay big bucks to get that exact style
112 赞2017/11/8
i was looking to see if anyone else noticed. that part in his hair is sharp
54 赞2017/11/8
He's a Dapper Dan man.
38 赞2017/11/8
It was very common, yes. It's actually not *that* difficult to do, even by yourself, with some wax/pomade and some routine.
110 赞2017/11/8
[ORIGINAL](
) For more colorized photos and/or commissions, please visit me on: [Facebook](https://www.facebook.com/jecinci/) [Flickr](https://www.flickr.com/photos/jecinci_colorizations/) [Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/jecinci/) [Twitter](https://twitter.com/jecinci)
) For more colorized photos and/or commissions, please visit me on: [Facebook](https://www.facebook.com/jecinci/) [Flickr](https://www.flickr.com/photos/jecinci_colorizations/) [Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/jecinci/) [Twitter](https://twitter.com/jecinci)54 赞2017/11/8
So by colorizing this, in a way, you painted the Mona Lisa.
19 赞2017/11/8
> So by colorizing this, in a way, you **re**painted the Mona Lisa. There.
83 赞2017/11/8
I just realized how small the Mona Lisa is.
99 赞2017/11/8
It really is much smaller than one would expect. Here's my shot from the louvre https://imgur.com/gallery/fb0aS
128 赞2017/11/8
being a tourist is fun but being with tourists is the worst. If only the irony didn't hurt so bad...
28 赞2017/11/8
hahah true so true...I couldnt move in there, my god To think, we were told that the amount of tourists in this shot was only a 'low' amount
45 赞2017/11/8
The original basic bitch
19 赞2017/11/8
Overrated piece of shit
41 赞2017/11/8
She looks happy to be out of all of that packaging
33 赞2017/11/8
That guys hair part is the real work of art here
19 赞2017/11/8
[内容已删除]
12 赞2017/11/8
Honestly, the Mona Lisa has to be the most overrated piece of art ever outside of post-modern nonsense like the blue square on white canvas. It’s just a well done picture of a lady, if it wasn’t painted by Da Vinci, no one would recognize it today
15 赞2017/11/8
It's so covered by soot and varnish layers that the details are hidden. 5 years ago they discovered another version they believe was painted at the same time by a student of da Vinci but has been protected from the elements...http://www.damncoolpictures.com/2012/02/mona-lisa-copy-painted-by-leonardo-da.html
11 赞2017/11/8
Can we stop to admire that bloke on the right's perfect parting?
7 赞2017/11/8
>* On 21 August 1911, the painting was stolen from the Louvre. >* In 1956, part of the painting was damaged when a vandal threw acid at it. >* On 30 December of that year, a rock was thrown at the painting, dislodging a speck of pigment near the left elbow, later restored. >* The use of bulletproof glass has shielded the Mona Lisa from subsequent attacks. In April 1974, a woman, upset by the museum's policy for disabled people, sprayed red paint at it while it was being displayed at the Tokyo National Museum. >* On 2 August 2009, a Russian woman, distraught over being denied French citizenship, threw a ceramic teacup purchased at the Louvre; the vessel shattered against the glass enclosure. Damn, she survived a robbery, multiple assaults **and** world war II.
6 赞2017/11/8
For a famous painting like this do you find a scan of it and corner-pin it over the image in a transfer-mode to match the color perfectly?
5 赞2017/11/8
Fantastic job with this!
5 赞2017/11/8
*"Can someone explain why the whole wide world is obsessed with a Garbage Pail Kid?"*
4 赞2017/11/8
"The war's over, Lisa."
"Excellent! Now those filthy Jews will finally pay for their crimes!"
"Actually, we won, Lisa."
"OK... groovy. Yay, Jews..."
4 赞2017/11/8
Why don't they wear gloves? Not invented yet?
16 赞2017/11/8
probably because its end of fucking world war
3 赞2017/11/8
Serious question: How accurate is the colorization techniques for old photos? And does having something in the photo that one already has color photos of (in this case a famous painting) increase that accuracy?
3 赞2017/11/8
5 years ago they discovered another version they believe was painted at the same time by a student of da Vinci but has been protected from the elements...http://www.damncoolpictures.com/2012/02/mona-lisa-copy-painted-by-leonardo-da.html
3 赞2017/11/8
[内容已删除]